Both these devices support Micron 3D NAND technology and are compatible with Mac, PC, and Linux. They also have a form factor of 2.5 inches.
The Crucial MX500 deli is a new upgrade to your system with a massive storage capacity of up to 4TB ensuring competitive, efficient, and reliable performance. It has a quality speed, useful software, and encryption support for a fair price. It lacks behind its opponent for having a lower TBW.
The Crucial BX500 is a power booster for your computer’s performance. Adding this SSD to your computer will ensure 45 times more energy efficiency than a typical hard drive that helps in improve battery life. It lacks behind its opponent for having a lower storage capacity.
Table of Contents
Side By Side Comparison:
Here the Crucial MX500;
- has a relatively massive storage capacity.
- Is more flexibility in the product range.
- reads and writes at a relatively faster rate.
- has a higher MTTF value which ensures high reliability.
- is lighter in weight.
- is relatively cheaper.
On the other side, the Crucial BX500:
- is thinner in dimension.
- has a longer life cycle due to a higher TBW value.
Common Features of both devices:
- Multi-step data and Reliable system.
- Self-management and reporting technology (SMART).
- Error correction code (ECC) provides an exclusive data defense averting exploitation in your files.
- Dynamic garbage assortment.
Features of Crucial MX500:
- Energetic writing speed with instant loading of files.
- Massive amount of data storage with the capacity of up to 4TB.
- Terminated range of liberated NAND (RAIN).
- Automatic detection of higher temperatures which helps in disconnecting power.
- Incorporated power loss resistance.
- Device sleep supports.
- More durable due to non-moving parts reducing wear out.
- AES 256-bit encryption helps in keeping personal data secured.
Features of Crucial BX500:
- Thermal management.
- SLC write speed up.
- Increase overall system receptiveness.
- 45x more energy efficient than a typical hard drive helps in improving battery life.
Analyzed from the features above it is concluded that MX500 is an efficient and reliable choice comparatively.
Structure and Temperature Analysis of both devices:
Crucial MX500 has a silver background with a blue lustrous center with MX written in the center. Below it follows a Meta description of the crucial by Micron with the company logo on the right and on the left form factor and SSD is written.
Crucial BX500 has a black background with BX embossed on the upper surface of the SSD and slightly above to the left crucial by Micron with company logo is written.
The dimension and width of MX500 are slightly more than its contender. The weight of this device is also much less than its competitor. So, it comes out more compact.
An operating temperature is an endurable temperature of the environment at which an SSD operates. Both SSDs operate in an ideal operating temperature range of 0°C to 70°C.
Mostly SSDs operate in this range and vary accordingly to the form factor and the SSD model.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| Dimension in inches ( Lx D x W) | 4.06 x 0.28 x 2.76 | 3.95 x 0.27 x 2.75 |
| Weight, g | 26.9 | 54.9 |
| Form factor | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
Technology Comparison
Micron is the leader in pioneering memory solutions that transmute the way the world practices information.
Micron replaced its previous 176-layer NAND technology, with the 232-layer NAND, with the benefit of offering a 50% quicker data transfer rate (2.4GB/s), 100% greater write bandwidth, and 75% greater read bandwidth.
3D NAND technology offers a lengthier duration, consumes lower power, handles increased performance, developing capacity, and hovering power proficiency of SSDs.
Both competitors utilize the advanced Micron 3D NAND technology and are ended up in a stalemate in this contest.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| Manufacturing Technology | Micron 3D NAND | Micron 3D NAND |
Can we tell which device would live longer?
TBW short for Terabytes Written is an important parameter that tells the cumulative amount of data you can write to an SSD over its lifespan.
It is an analysis of the endurance of a solid-state drive. Its value is given in the number of terabytes. A higher value of TBW guarantees an SSD with a greater lifespan.
BX500 seems to have a higher TBW value.
Hence it will have a longer lifespan.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| TBW (2TB) | 700TB, equal to 383GB per day for 5 year | 720TB, equal to 390GB per day for 5 years |
Which one is more Reliable? (MTTF)
MTTF short for Mean Time to Failure represents an estimated amount of time a system is anticipated to run before failing and assesses the steadfastness of non-repairable items and equals the meantime predictability until the first debacle of a module or system.
For repairable items, MTTF equals the probable span of the interval from repair to the first or succeeding failure. The higher the value of MTTF, the higher the reliability of an SSD.
MX500 seems to have a higher MTTF value than its contender hence this SSD is considered to be a reliable choice comparatively.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| MTTF | 1.8 million hours | 1.5 million hours |
Sequential Read/Write Speed
The Sequential read/write speed of an SSD is faster than other hard drives.
It measures the speed at which the blocks of data are read or written from the location.
The Sequential read/write speed of MX500 is comparatively higher than its contender.
Hence, MX500 will read and write at a relatively faster rate.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| Sequential Read Speed | 560 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
| Sequential Write Speed | 510 MB/s | 500 MB/s |
System Compatibility
Both SSDs are compatible with Mac, PC, and Linux systems aimed to upkeep high-volume and multithreading applications.
Hence both are equally compatible with different Operating Systems.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| Mac | Yes | Yes |
| PC | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
Product Range/Storage Capacities of these devcies:
MX500 has a huge storage capacity of up to 4TB while its competitor SSD has a lower storage capacity of up to 2TB. MX500 also offers flexibility in product options.
It offers 5 different sizes while its competitor SSD has less product variety and offers only 4 sizes.
Hence, it is concluded that overall MX500 is a better choice comparatively.
| Parameter | MX500 | BX500 |
| Capacity | 4TB, 2TB, 1TB, 500GB, 250GB | 2TB, 1TB, 480GB, 240GB |
